The question of restricting the resale of inherited assets after someone’s passing is a common one for estate planning attorneys like Steve Bliss in San Diego. While the idea of controlling assets even after they’ve been gifted or inherited seems intuitive for many, the legal landscape surrounding such restrictions is complex and varies significantly by the type of asset and the governing state laws. Generally, outright prohibitions on resale are difficult to enforce, particularly with tangible personal property. However, strategic planning within a trust can offer a degree of control, often balancing the desire for preservation with the beneficiary’s rights. Around 65% of high-net-worth individuals express concern about how their assets will be managed after their death, highlighting the importance of proactive estate planning to address such concerns.
What are the limitations on controlling inherited property?
Directly prohibiting the resale of inherited assets is often considered a restraint on alienation, and courts generally disfavor such restraints. The law favors the free transferability of property. This means a complete ban on selling inherited items is unlikely to hold up in court. However, a limited duration restriction, particularly within a well-structured trust, might be enforceable, especially if the restriction serves a legitimate purpose, like preserving family heirlooms or maintaining a charitable legacy. The key is to balance control with reasonable beneficiary rights. As Steve Bliss often explains, “It’s about crafting a plan that respects both the grantor’s wishes and the legal framework.”
How can a trust be used to restrict resale?
A revocable living trust is a powerful tool for implementing resale restrictions. Within the trust document, you can include provisions that specify a certain timeframe during which beneficiaries cannot sell particular assets. For example, you might stipulate that family heirlooms or artwork cannot be sold for ten years after your passing. The trust can also outline specific conditions under which resale is allowed, such as financial hardship or the need to fund long-term care. Such stipulations act as a contractual agreement between the grantor (the person creating the trust) and the beneficiaries. It’s crucial that beneficiaries are aware of these conditions before accepting the inheritance.
Does the type of asset affect resale restrictions?
The type of asset significantly impacts the enforceability of resale restrictions. Restrictions on real property (land and buildings) are often easier to enforce than those on personal property. For example, a trust could include a clause preventing the sale of a family farm for a specified period, preserving its agricultural use. However, restrictions on tangible personal property—like jewelry, art, or collectibles—are more susceptible to challenge, unless they are tied to a clear and compelling purpose, such as maintaining a family collection. Intangible assets, like stocks and bonds, typically have fewer restrictions beyond standard legal requirements.
What happens if I try to enforce an unenforceable restriction?
Attempting to enforce a restriction that a court deems unreasonable or illegal can lead to costly legal battles and ultimately fail. It could also damage relationships with your beneficiaries. In one instance, a client of Steve Bliss, let’s call her Eleanor, desperately wanted to prevent her son from selling a valuable antique car inherited from her late husband. She included a strict prohibition in her will. However, her son, facing unexpected medical bills, challenged the restriction. The court sided with the son, deeming the prohibition an unreasonable restraint on alienation, and Eleanor spent thousands in legal fees with nothing to show for it.
What are some best practices for implementing resale restrictions?
To maximize the enforceability of resale restrictions, several best practices should be followed. First, the restrictions must be reasonable in duration and scope. A temporary restriction tied to a legitimate purpose is more likely to be upheld than a permanent ban. Second, the restrictions should be clearly and unambiguously stated in the trust document. Ambiguity can lead to disputes and legal challenges. Third, it’s crucial to consider the financial needs of the beneficiaries. A restriction that unduly burdens a beneficiary’s ability to support themselves is less likely to be enforced. Finally, consult with an experienced estate planning attorney like Steve Bliss to ensure that the restrictions comply with applicable state laws.
Can a “spendthrift clause” help with this?
While a spendthrift clause primarily protects beneficiaries from creditors, it can indirectly support resale restrictions. A spendthrift clause prevents beneficiaries from assigning their interest in the trust to others, which can discourage quick sales to satisfy debts. It doesn’t directly prohibit resale, but it adds a layer of protection against forced liquidation. As Steve Bliss notes, “A spendthrift clause is a valuable tool for asset protection, but it’s not a substitute for clear and enforceable resale restrictions.” Think of it as a supporting element within a comprehensive estate plan.
How did a client successfully implement a resale restriction?
I recall another client, Mr. Henderson, a passionate collector of rare books, who wanted to ensure his collection remained intact for future generations. He worked with Steve Bliss to create a trust that stipulated his grandchildren could only sell books from the collection after they reached the age of 50, and only with the approval of a trust advisor. This restriction was considered reasonable because it allowed for eventual sale but provided a period for the collection to be preserved and appreciated. Mr. Henderson’s grandchildren understood the importance of the collection and agreed to the terms, creating a harmonious outcome. It’s a testament to how careful planning and communication can successfully balance control and beneficiary rights.
Ultimately, while completely prohibiting the resale of inherited assets is difficult, strategic estate planning—especially through the use of a carefully drafted trust—can provide a degree of control. It’s essential to work with an experienced attorney who understands the nuances of estate law and can tailor a plan to your specific needs and wishes. Remember, the goal isn’t to exert absolute control but to preserve your legacy and ensure your assets are managed according to your values.
About Steven F. Bliss Esq. at San Diego Probate Law:
Secure Your Family’s Future with San Diego’s Trusted Trust Attorney. Minimize estate taxes with stress-free Probate. We craft wills, trusts, & customized plans to ensure your wishes are met and loved ones protected.
My skills are as follows:
● Probate Law: Efficiently navigate the court process.
● Probate Law: Minimize taxes & distribute assets smoothly.
● Trust Law: Protect your legacy & loved ones with wills & trusts.
● Bankruptcy Law: Knowledgeable guidance helping clients regain financial stability.
● Compassionate & client-focused. We explain things clearly.
● Free consultation.
Map To Steve Bliss at San Diego Probate Law: https://g.co/kgs/WzT6443
Address:
San Diego Probate Law3914 Murphy Canyon Rd, San Diego, CA 92123
(858) 278-2800
Key Words Related To San Diego Probate Law:
| wills | estate planning | living trusts |
| probate attorney | estate planning attorney | living trust attorney |
| probate lawyer | estate planning lawyer | living trust lawyer |
Feel free to ask Attorney Steve Bliss about: “Can pets be included in a trust?” or “What if the deceased was mentally incapacitated when the will was signed?” and even “How do I name a backup trustee or executor?” Or any other related questions that you may have about Trusts or my trust law practice.